tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7959025705353546660.post1616137941329732351..comments2024-02-16T03:03:01.035-08:00Comments on robotGEEK'S Cult Cinema: robotGEEK'S Review: Memoirs of an Invisible ManrobotGEEKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00355070295108163031noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7959025705353546660.post-4460883898591227022013-10-04T04:55:48.090-07:002013-10-04T04:55:48.090-07:00I think you meant digital effects in 1992, not opt...I think you meant <i>digital</i> effects in 1992, not optical effects, which had been around for a couple of decades when this film was made.rennmaxbetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11194685520231517099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7959025705353546660.post-7287464629552620692013-09-26T10:18:38.373-07:002013-09-26T10:18:38.373-07:00Oh yes, it would have definitely turned out quite ...Oh yes, it would have definitely turned out quite different. But I actually enjoy it much more without the comedy. I know it's hard to see Chase in a film like this and have it "not" be funny, but I think he was solid as the straight guy. But you are right though, especially considering Reitman was still a solid A List director back then when this was initially supposed to get made, it would probably have a much bigger following than it does now. Thanks for stopping by Jack! robotGEEKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00355070295108163031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7959025705353546660.post-19088793453085223842013-09-21T15:18:11.415-07:002013-09-21T15:18:11.415-07:00Yeah, this is flawed but still really enjoyable. I...Yeah, this is flawed but still really enjoyable. I loved how the film flipped back and forth between having Chase be literally invisible and then have shots where you can see him but the other characters can't. I think with Ivan Reitman directing and a little more comedy this could have been a classic.Jack Thursbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03101157160144955486noreply@blogger.com